Forgot password?
  • Home
  • Learn About Film
  • Resources
    • Storage Alternatives
    • Low Temperature Storage Basics
    • Thermal Equilibration of Film Materials
    • Storage Calculator for Color
    • Storage Calculator for Acetate
    • Days Out of Storage (Color)
    • Days Out of Storage (Fresh Acetate)
    • Days Out of Storage (Degraded Acetate)
    • Using A-D Strips
  • Contact

Forgot Password?

Enter your email address to reset your password. You will receive an email with a link to reset your password if an account exists for your email.

Storage Alternatives: Micro-environments vs Macro-environment

In the early 1990s the use of micro-environmental approaches was investigated in an attempt to further postpone the deterioration of acetate materials. The basic idea was to create a moisture-controlled microenvironment surrounding the film as an alternative to controlling temperature and RH in the whole storage area. This can be achieved by adding moisture-adsorbents, acid-scavengers (e.g., molecular sieves) to adsorb deterioration-by-products (e.g., acetic acid), or by moisture-preconditioning the film prior to storage inside a sealed enclosure. Adsorbents such as silica gel and molecular sieves have been tested, as well as conditioning the film at low RH. Although a macro-environmental approach is generally favored, the use of sealed micro-environments can still have its place in preserving film in certain situations. Facts and guidance are summarized below.

 

Sealed micro-environments

Macro-environment

Initial moisture conditioning at low RH (20%) Use of adsorbents
(e.g., molecular sieves)
Temperature and humidity control
Suitability May be practical for small collections only, or portions of large collections May be practical for small collections only, or portions of large collections For large collections, it is the most practical option
Requirements

RH-controlled walkin space for moisture pre-conditioning

Sealed housing (e.g., closable bag inside or outside the film enclosure, aluminum tape)

Time and effort (labor intensive)

Molecular sieves packets

Sealed housing (e.g., closable bag inside or outside the film enclosure, aluminum tape,…)

Periodic replacement of the molecular sieves

Time and effort (labor intensive)

Film moisture content will be governed by temperature and RH levels maintained in the storage environment

No added labor to prepare film prior to storage
Effect on acetate decay at room temperature (68°F)

Life span can be improved by a factor of 3 to 4 if film is conditioned to 20% RH as compared to 50% RH

Stability benefits come solely from lowering film moisture content

By using molecular sieves (5 wt. %) life span can be improved by a factor of 3 to 4

Supplier recommendations: 2 wt.%

Stability benefits come mostly from lowering film moisture content  
At room temperature factor of improvement will be similar to those obtained through micro-environmental approaches
Effect of low storage temperature

Storing the sealed materials at low temperature will drastically extend the life span of film

Film stability benefits come mostly from low storage temperature, and to a lesser extent from the reduced film moisture content

Estimate the stability benefits using the Storage Calculator for Acetate and the Storage Calculator for Color (available in Recommendations when logged in).

Storing the sealed materials in presence of adsorbents at low temperature will drastically extend the life span of film

Film stability benefits come mostly from low storage temperature, to a lesser extent from the reduced film moisture content, and even less from the “capture” of degradation -by-products (e.g., acetic acid)

Low temperature has the greatest potential to maximize film life span

To estimate the effect of temperature and RH on fresh acetate, degrading acetate, and color dyes use the Storage Calculator for Acetate and the Storage Calculator for Color (available in Recommendations when logged in).
Ease of access to film

Film micro-environment will be disrupted by accessing the materials

Preparation procedure will need to be repeated after accessing materials

Micro-environment will be disrupted by accessing the materials

Adsorbents will need to be replaced
No extra labor should be required
Key points for decision making

Viable option for small collections, or for situations where adverse RH levels cannot not be controlled

Place sealed materials at subfreezing temperature to maximize film stability

Efficient option to minimize the risk of contamination

Will entail added labor and the need for a space providing at least temporarily a low RH level

For reference, moisture conditioning may require several weeks during which materials should be exposed to low RH without enclosure

Viable option for small collections, or for situations where adverse RH levels cannot not be controlled

Place sealed materials with adsorbents at subfreezing temperature to maximize film stability

Efficient option to minimize the risk of contamination

Will entail added labor initially and periodically to replace adsorbents

Most practical option to provide proper storage environment to large film collections

Use low temperature to maximize life span of film while maintaining RH between 20-50%

No need for “extra” preparation of materials

When storing degrading acetate, air quality should be monitored, and controlled as needed to minimize the risk of contamination

 

 




© , Image Permanence Institute (IPI).

FilmCare.org is a web-based film resource created by the Image Permanence Institute, an academic research center devoted to research that informs the preservation of cultural heritage collections. The Image Permanence Institute is a department of the College of Art and Design at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT).

Sign Up

Please fill out your account information.